Which religion is promoted at Catholic congress?

The Los Angeles Religious Education Congress, scheduled for February 26 - March 1, features some of the most progressive voices in the American Catholic church. Cardinal Mahony appears unmoved that a fellow bishop has excommunicated some of them.

 
by Stephanie Block Wednesday, February 25, 2009
 

The Los Angeles Religious Education Congress is quite a fixture. Catholics have been complaining about it at least since 1993 (which is as far back as my file on the subject goes, though, from the look of the articles written in that year, I’d guess this wasn’t a new issue). The most glaring fact about the Congress has been its blatant relationship with the dissident Catholic movement, Call to Action. Just which religious is being espoused here? This year’s Congress is due to be held February 26 – March 1, 2009.

A Bit of Background

Call to Action’s first significant accomplishment was the hijacking of a United States Catholic Bishops Conference in late October 1976. The conference was a triumph of Alinsky-style organizing, choreographed by the Alinsky disciple, Monsignor Jack Egan of Chicago. Delegates from across the US rubber-stamped nine position papers that had been prepared by the organizers in advance, during well-publicized “hearings” around the country.

Handpicked, “progressive” participants and tightly controlled use of the microphone ensured that there was no Catholic objection to ratifying these position papers, which demanded that:

-divorced, remarried couples might receive Holy Communion;

-women be ordained as priests and as bishops;

-the Church reverse its doctrine about contraception;

-the Church mitigate its doctrine about abortion;

-the Church revise its defense of right to property and reasonable profit, and- the Church be restructured non-hierarchically and democratically.

Call to Action continues to support these positions.

On Pentecost in 1996, the group launched its “We Are Church: A Catholic Referendum,” repeating the same demands whilst provoking Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz of Lincoln, Nebraska, to excommunicate all Call to Action members within his diocese, a move which the Vatican upheld.

By contrast, the Archbishop of Los Angeles, Cardinal Roger Mahony was reported “to hold no position on Call to Action…” though he made no effort to hinder distribution of “We Are Church” petitions around the Archdiocese, including a function he attended. More significantly, over the years, scores of Call to Action speakers have addressed the annual Los Angeles Archdiocesan Religious Education Congress.

This Year Is No Different

The 2009 Congress continues the tradition of anti-Catholic speakers, beginning with its keynoter, the non-denominational Evangelical minister Jim Wallis. Reverend Wallis is a progressive political activist who founded and edits Sojourners magazine and directs an organization by the same name. In anticipation of the 1996 elections, Wallis convened what was, at the time, called an “evangelical para-church political action group,” Call to Renewal, which included several Catholic “collaborating organizations” – specifically the Catholic Campaign for Human Development, the United States Catholic Conference – Department of Social Development and World Peace, the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, Pax Christi-USA, Maryknoll Justice and Peace, and Catholic Charities, USA.

In 2006, Call to Renewal merged boards with Sojourners and, anticipating the 2008 presidential elections, Wallis began a more ambitious political project, Faith in Public Life. Faith in Public Life, like its predecessor Call to Renewal, was designed as a “faith” response to the “religious right.” Organizational rhetoric complains that the “religious right” has abandoned the issues of “social and economic justice” for a “narrow focus” on abortion and homosexuality. What it doesn’t advertise, however, are that many of the groups in its network are abortion and homosexual rights advocates.

Another speaker at the Archdiocesan Congress is the Rev. Richard Rohr, a Catholic priest. Rohr has travelled around the country with Jim Wallis, presiding at ecumenical Communion services, called “Thomas Masses,” for Wallis’ progressive, political rallies. Liberationist Rev. Virgilio Elizondo, founder of The Mexican American Cultural Center (MACC) is also a scheduled speaker. Elizondo has, in the past, stated publicly that spirituality is not based on dogmas, doctrines, laws, or directions but that, “We are called to be architects of a new earth and a new heaven.” The list goes on and on.

Well-known Call to Action speakers include Rev. Patrick Brennan, Rev. Michael Crosby, Sr. Fran Ferder, Thomas Groome, and Dr. Megan McKenna. Other dissidents include Sr. Barbara Fiand, Dr.Tom Beaudoin, Rev. John Cusick, Rev. Ken Deasy, Monsignor Ray East, Rev. Richard Fragomeni, Greer Gordon, David Haas, Rev. Marty Haugen, Rev. John Heagle, Rev. Brian Massingale, Fr. Chris Ponnet, and Sr. Barbara Reid.

One has to wonder, considering the ongoing paedophile scandal that embroils the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, why Cardinal Mahony insists on supporting this doctrinally scandalous escapade…oh, wait. Did we just answer the question?

Info:  Religious Education Congress  

Stephanie Block is the editor of Los Pequenos - a New Mexico-based publication. Her columns are made possible by the sponsorship of generous individuals who believe information about the development and dissemination of progressive ideology needs to be more widely understood. Please fell free to share -- acknowledging authorship -- these articles with others. If you would like more frequent publication of Stephanie Block's work, tax-deductible donations can be sent to: Catholic Media Coalition - PO Box 427 Great Cacapon, WV 25422 Attn: Progressive Watch

 
 
Opinion RSS
 
Comments
Fr Mullen with all due respect it would better it the whole of Matthew 7 was read.

"Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.


by Noel | Tuesday, March 10, 2009  1:23:50 PM

If I understand you correctly and we’re never to judge someone else’s words or actions, you’re remiss in taking me to task for taking someone else to task. By such (il)logic, the admonition of sin – one of the spiritual works of mercy – would itself be a sin!

You know perfectly well Jesus was telling us not to judge people. Only a colander-head would think He meant we shouldn’t judge ideas.

Such obvious silliness aside, the issue of my article is that the Los Angeles Religious Education Congress hosts dissenting speakers, as it has for years. This isn’t a matter of opinion…and certainly not a matter of my opinion. If one can demonstrate that a good number of the speakers contradict Church teaching, then it’s true to say the Congress hosts dissention.

Of course people can legitimately disagree about all sorts of things: urban infrastructure, opera, Indian cuisine…but when we disagree over whether 2 + 2 = 4, we’re living in different worlds.

Assuming you and I live in the same world, for the moment, one of the facts of the 2 + 2 = 4 world is that professing Catholics bind themselves to moral and theological truth. Catholicism isn’t a cultural identity; it’s unity with a body of believers (past, present, and future) – and therefore unity in what they believe. That makes those beliefs unchanging, since the present and the past are one. The individual believer continues to have free will and retains the capacity to dissent from this body at any time but dissension does have consequences. Among those consequences is that willful disbelief in what the body – the Church – teaches puts the dissenter into disunity with the body, and therefore “outside” of the Church.

This isn’t about judging “good” or “bad” people. There are kind, generous, prayerful dissenters and sin-saturated Catholics (of whom I am the first). My article wasn’t about who at the Los Angeles Religious Education Congress is a good or a bad person, of which I have no knowledge and wouldn’t presume to judge, but rather that the Congress consistently features a lot of dissenting speakers – of which I have some knowledge and am not only morally obligated to judge but to decry.

Stephanie Block


by Stephanie Block | Monday, March 02, 2009  9:44:45 AM

While we certainly can't know the state of a person's soul and judge them in that manner, it is reasonable to judge an action or a position which that person holds to a "higher standard," namely that of truth as handed from Jesus Christ through the apostles and the Magisterium of the Church. If certain persons hold positions clearly contrary to the teachings of the CATHOLIC Church, what on earth are they doing giving addresses at a CATHOLIC education conference? It is justified to "judge" the action and position of the dissenters. With pastoral concern for all people reading this, I recommend (along with reading the catechism) that all reflect on Ephesians 6:14 "Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of justice..."

by John | Sunday, March 01, 2009  2:06:34 PM

The author seems to mistakenly hold that positions different from her own are "dissent." The Church holds us to a higher standard than that. There are many profoundly good and holy people on her list of dissenters. I recommend, with pastoral concern, that she reflect on Matt 7:1-2 -- "Stop judging, that you may not be judged. For as you judge, so will you be judged, and the measure with which you measure will be measured out to you."

by Fr. Patrick Mullen | Thursday, February 26, 2009  7:37:18 AM

Subscribe to our newsletter
Your email:


© Copyright Daily Estimate, All rights reserved. RSS
Submit an article
Advertise
Terms of use
Contact for reprint rights
Contact
This page took 0.5156seconds to load